$5.9T
Global Family Office AUM
67%
Family Offices Investing Direct
53
Codified Structural Rules
Co-investment terms that hide who holds real control
Co-investment terms often mirror whatever the lead negotiated, without the same visibility into who actually controls the company day to day. Over a multi-year hold, that gap tends to surface exactly when you have the least leverage to fix it.
See who actually decides
VIE structures your family office rarely gets to stress-test
Co-investing behind a lead means inheriting the same VIE enforceability risk, without always seeing the legal opinion it was built on, or having counsel positioned to independently stress-test it before capital moves.
Stress-test the VIEData rooms curated for outside, passive investors
As a smaller, often passive check, a family office typically sees the same curated data room as every other investor, with less standing to request the follow-up materials a lead investor gets access to.
See past the data room
Founder incentives that diverge from your capital horizon
Capital that behaves differently once it's policy-enabled rather than market-driven, shifting founder incentives in ways a term sheet won't show until growth slows or the subsidy cycle ends, on a timeline that rarely matches a family office's expectations.
Check incentive alignmentWhy Concentration Changes The Math
Drag to set how many active China positions your office holds, and see how much of your capital a single structural miss can expose.
Your family office
16.7%
of deployed capital tied to a single deal
A diversified fund (30 positions)
3.3%
of deployed capital tied to a single deal
A diversified fund can absorb a structural miss. At 6 positions, your office carries 5x the concentration, which is why the same blind spot costs you more.
ZINVEO does not decide. It exposes structural asymmetry. Final decision remains
with the Investment Committee.
Search our coverage, or request direct access to ZINVEO's structural risk engine.
